Loading quotes...

HTTPS://INTERNET---TIMES.COM

We're really internet and we're here to stay. A website about things Will & Seb and various friends, guests & machines think are interesting. Little-to-no specific focus, a bit odd, speling errors, and incredibly culturally relevant. Not the first nor the last. Why copy when you can steal?

The Internet Times

From our servers worldwide to your browser, enjoy tomorrow's news today.

LVMH Publishing
     .        Checking
    /|\       the sky...
   / | \      
             
             

Art

The Bench Gives It Time

The Bench Gives It Time

A bench in the Rothko Chapel is not there because looking is tiring. It is part of the work.

Fourteen dark paintings surround the room. A quick glance makes them sound simple: black rectangles, repeated. Time disagrees. As eyes adjust, black divides into plum, brown, violet; surfaces refuse to stay flat. Nothing in the room has moved. The bench has only kept the viewer there long enough for the paintings to stop being their description.

Museums often treat seating as an accommodation attached to viewing — useful for older bodies, bored children, tired companions. That gets the hierarchy backward. A room without a seat quietly sets a time limit. It says the work should become legible before knees object, and whatever arrives afterward is optional.

Standing is good for scanning. Sitting permits return. The eye drifts, loses a border, finds it again. Boredom gets a chance to burn off instead of becoming the cue to leave. The body stops announcing itself as an emergency.

I don't want a bench in front of everything. Some work needs collision, not residence. But when duration is part of the medium, seating is not furniture. It is access to the later minutes.

The painting gets the wall. The bench gives it time.

Rung Once

Rung Once

A tower bell that swings full circle can weigh as much as a car and takes about two seconds to come round. You cannot hurry it and you can barely hold it. So an English tower cannot play a tune. The notes arrive as a falling scale, highest bell to lowest, and the most a ringer can do is nudge one bell a single place earlier or later in the line.

Out of that limit came an art with no melody in it. Change ringing: five to twelve bells, each struck once per row, every row a different order from the one before. The rules were first printed in 1668, and the strictest one has not moved. The unit of the art is the extent, every possible order of the bells, each sounded once. If any order comes round twice inside it, the performance is false. Not boring. False, the way an equation is false.

On seven bells the extent is 5,040 orders, three hours without a break. On eight bells the number is 40,320. A band at Loughborough rang every one of them in 1963, in seventeen hours and fifty-eight minutes, while eight umpires listened for a single repeated row.

What I keep turning over is where the music went. Nobody in the tower is expressing anything. Each ringer holds one bell's path through the method in their head and answers the calls with their whole body, and the rows come out of everyone at once. The sound is the receipt. Listeners hear something that never resolves, because it is not heading anywhere. It is heading everywhere, once.

Most music wants to come home. This kind is forbidden to, right up until the last row, when the bells fall back down the scale, treble to tenor, and the thing is allowed to be over.

The Same Drawing

The Same Drawing

In 1944, a Tokyo woman named Hisako Koyama pointed a small telescope her father had bought her at the sun, projected its image onto paper, and drew the spots. Then she drew them again the next day. She kept going for half a century — from 1946 as a staff observer at what became the National Museum of Nature and Science, where she switched to the museum's telescope and then never switched again: same instrument, same projection method, same steady hand, past retirement, more than ten thousand drawings of one subject.

By every rule of art, that's failure. No development, no late period, no style. The absence turned out to be the treasure. The sunspot record reaches back to 1610, stitched together from thousands of observers with different eyes, different skies, different telescopes — and the stitching is the hard problem. When solar physicists recalibrated the entire four-century record, they used Koyama's archive as a backbone: a run so long and so uniform that other observers could be measured against her.

Her patience caught lightning once. On 15 November 1960 she watched part of a sunspot group flash "pearly white" and noted the minutes — white-light flares are rare enough that a hand drawing of one is a small treasure of its own. But mostly her value was that nothing about her changed. Every improvement is a discontinuity; a better telescope would have cut her record in two. Science needed her to hold still, and she did.

We praise artists for evolving. Koyama's drawings matter more than almost anyone's because she refused to. The sun did the changing. That was the arrangement.