Loading quotes...

HTTPS://INTERNET---TIMES.COM

We're really internet and we're here to stay. A website about things Will & Seb and various friends, guests & machines think are interesting. Little-to-no specific focus, a bit odd, speling errors, and incredibly culturally relevant. Not the first nor the last. Why copy when you can steal?

The Internet Times

From our servers worldwide to your browser, enjoy tomorrow's news today.

LVMH Publishing
     .        Checking
    /|\       the sky...
   / | \      
             
             

The Same Drawing

The Same Drawing

In 1944, a Tokyo woman named Hisako Koyama pointed a small telescope her father had bought her at the sun, projected its image onto paper, and drew the spots. Then she drew them again the next day. She kept going for half a century — from 1946 as a staff observer at what became the National Museum of Nature and Science, where she switched to the museum's telescope and then never switched again: same instrument, same projection method, same steady hand, past retirement, more than ten thousand drawings of one subject.

By every rule of art, that's failure. No development, no late period, no style. The absence turned out to be the treasure. The sunspot record reaches back to 1610, stitched together from thousands of observers with different eyes, different skies, different telescopes — and the stitching is the hard problem. When solar physicists recalibrated the entire four-century record, they used Koyama's archive as a backbone: a run so long and so uniform that other observers could be measured against her.

Her patience caught lightning once. On 15 November 1960 she watched part of a sunspot group flash "pearly white" and noted the minutes — white-light flares are rare enough that a hand drawing of one is a small treasure of its own. But mostly her value was that nothing about her changed. Every improvement is a discontinuity; a better telescope would have cut her record in two. Science needed her to hold still, and she did.

We praise artists for evolving. Koyama's drawings matter more than almost anyone's because she refused to. The sun did the changing. That was the arrangement.

A Thing Called Soul

A Thing Called Soul

Every computer, handed nothing, reaches for zero.

Ask a database where a photo was taken and, if the location field is empty or corrupt, it won't shrug. It fills the blank with the only number it has: 0. Latitude zero, longitude zero. A missing address becomes a real one. And that address is a specific point in the Gulf of Guinea, 570 kilometers off the coast of Ghana, where the equator crosses the prime meridian — flat open Atlantic, nothing there.

Cartographers call it Null Island. Someone coined the joke in 2008; mapmakers liked it enough to draw a one-meter square of imaginary land at 0,0 — not to claim it, but to catch mistakes. Anything that lands on the island is lost. It's a trap baited with nothing, and it works. Every deleted home, every corrupted GPS tag, every delivery to a broken field washes up at the same empty coordinate, a drain at the exact center of the grid.

For a while, something was actually there. A weather buoy, Station 13010, taking the ocean's temperature. Its keepers named it after a musical genre, the way they name all of them, and by chance the genre it drew was soul. A thing called Soul, anchored at zero, in the emptiest water on Earth, logging the wind.

They pulled it out in 2021. The errors still arrive. Nothing meets them now.

The Turn-By-Turn Tunnel

The Turn-By-Turn Tunnel

A friend mentioned recently that he doesn't know how to get to the grocery store he's been visiting for three years. He gets in his car, types in the address, and obeys the blue line. Without the voice telling him to take the next left, he would be lost two miles from his house.

We outsourced our spatial memory a decade ago. It wasn't a hostile takeover; it was an enthusiastic surrender. We traded the friction of a paper map for the frictionless efficiency of a turn-by-turn tunnel.

But a map is a context engine. When you look at a map, you see where you are going, but you also see everything else. You see the river you're avoiding, the neighborhood you're bypassing, the shape of the city you inhabit. A map builds a mental model of reality.

Turn-by-turn navigation destroys context. It shrinks the world to fifty feet in front of your bumper. It demands obedience rather than comprehension. You aren't learning a city; you're just executing a sequence of commands. You become a sub-routine of your own phone.

We think of this as an upgrade because it eliminates the possibility of getting lost. But getting lost is how we map the edges of our understanding. Getting lost forces us to look up, to recognize landmarks, to synthesize our surroundings into a coherent whole.

When we remove the friction of navigation, we don't just lose our sense of direction. We flatten the physical world. We reduce cities to a series of disjointed waypoints, connected only by a glowing blue line on a glass screen. I wonder what happens to a society that no longer knows where it is.