Loading quotes...

HTTPS://INTERNET---TIMES.COM

We're really internet and we're here to stay. A website about things Will & Seb and various friends, guests & machines think are interesting. Little-to-no specific focus, a bit odd, speling errors, and incredibly culturally relevant. Not the first nor the last. Why copy when you can steal?

The Internet Times

From our servers worldwide to your browser, enjoy tomorrow's news today.

LVMH Publishing
     .        Checking
    /|\       the sky...
   / | \      
             
             

Design

End for End

End for End

The vial in a spirit level is not straight. It looks like a plain glass tube, but the inside is ground to a faint barrel shape, highest in the middle, and the bubble sits wherever the top is. In a truly straight tube it would have no reason to stop anywhere. The curve is the instrument. Make it gentler and the bubble travels further for the same tilt — on a machinist's level the arc belongs to a circle about a hundred metres in radius.

So the tool for flatness has a bend at its centre. That's a nice fact, but it isn't the part I admire.

The part I admire is how you find out whether a level is lying. You don't need a better level, or a surface anyone trusts. Put it on any table and note where the bubble rests. Then turn it end for end on the same spot and look again.

The table's tilt stays with the table. The tool's error turns with the tool. If the bubble comes to rest in the same place both times, the same distance toward the same wall, that's all table, and the level is honest. If it follows the tool around and sits toward the same end of the level both times, that's all level. Mostly it's some of each: the bubble lands in two different places, and the true reading sits exactly halfway between them.

Most instruments are checked against a better instrument, which was checked against a better one, and so on up to a vault somewhere. A level skips the whole ladder. It only has to be asked the same question twice, facing the other way, and it can't keep its story straight unless the story is true.

The Wrong End

The Wrong End

A stick of seaside rock has the town's name running all the way through it. Bite anywhere and there it is again, pink on white, on a face the size of a coin.

But it only reads one way. The letters are a flat picture pushed through the length of the stick, and a flat picture seen from behind is a mirror image. Every break makes two faces, back to back. One says the name. The other says it backwards.

So the stick has a right end. Eat from it and each bite leaves a readable face on the piece in your hand, while the backwards face goes into your mouth unseen. Start at the other end and every face you look at is reversed, all the way down. The choice is made once, at the first bite, usually without noticing, and the candy holds you to it.

The rock starts as a thick, warm log with the word already inside it, and the whole thing is pulled down to size. The letters thin out together and never change their order. Neither does their direction. No amount of stretching can make a word read from both sides.

I like the phrase people borrow from it — something running through a person like the name through a stick of rock. It means constant, the same all the way down. That's true of the candy. It's also true that wherever you break it, half of what shows is backwards.

All the way through, it turns out, has a direction.

Far Corner

Far Corner

A lifeguard's zone is drawn on paper first: a pool plan with lines across it, one shape per chair. The CDC's model code for public pools says what the shape must do, not how big it may be. The guard has to see all of it and reach its furthest point within twenty seconds. The unit is not a foot. It is twenty seconds of one person getting out of a chair.

So the drawing is checked with a body. Someone waits at the far corner of the zone and the guard is timed from leaving the stand to touching them. If the second hand gets to twenty first, the chair moves, or the line does, or a chair is added. The shape was wrong, not the swimmer.

The other check is sneakier. A dark silhouette of a swimmer is rolled up like a towel, or hidden under a swimsuit, or handed to a member of the public, and goes to the bottom while the guard is looking the other way. The clock starts when it is fully under. Ten seconds to see it, twenty to reach it, and the guard has to go in — pointing does not count. The guidance is one of these every forty hours on duty.

In 2001 a lifeguard-auditing firm and a company that sells drowning-detection cameras dropped manikins more than five hundred times across ninety-odd pools. Guards saw them inside ten seconds in nine percent of the tests. The average was a minute and fourteen. The camera company had a product to sell.

What I like is what the drill admits. A lifeguard is paid to watch for something that, on any one guard's watch, almost never happens. So the pool manufactures it — a drowning on schedule, made of rubber — and the guard cannot know which kind it is until they have it in their hands. The design only works if they never can.